🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, states are pouring hundreds of billions into what's termed “sovereign AI” – creating their own machine learning technologies. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are vying to develop AI that understands regional dialects and cultural nuances.

The Worldwide AI Competition

This movement is an element in a larger international race led by tech giants from the United States and China. Whereas firms like a leading AI firm and a social media giant allocate substantial funds, developing countries are likewise making their own investments in the artificial intelligence domain.

But amid such vast amounts in play, can less wealthy nations achieve notable benefits? As noted by a specialist from a well-known policy organization, “Unless you’re a rich government or a large corporation, it’s a significant burden to develop an LLM from the ground up.”

Defence Considerations

Numerous countries are reluctant to rely on external AI systems. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for example, American-made AI solutions have occasionally fallen short. One example featured an AI agent used to teach students in a distant area – it interacted in English with a thick American accent that was difficult to follow for native students.

Furthermore there’s the state security dimension. For India’s security agencies, relying on specific external systems is viewed inadmissible. According to a developer commented, It's possible it contains some unvetted training dataset that could claim that, such as, a certain region is separate from India … Using that certain model in a military context is a major risk.”

He added, I’ve consulted people who are in the military. They wish to use AI, but, disregarding certain models, they are reluctant to rely on American technologies because data could travel abroad, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Initiatives

As a result, some nations are backing local initiatives. An example this initiative is underway in the Indian market, where a firm is attempting to build a domestic LLM with state funding. This effort has allocated about a substantial sum to artificial intelligence advancement.

The expert envisions a model that is more compact than premier tools from Western and Eastern tech companies. He explains that India will have to compensate for the financial disparity with skill. Based in India, we don’t have the option of allocating billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete against for example the enormous investments that the America is devoting? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the intellectual challenge is essential.”

Regional Priority

In Singapore, a government initiative is funding language models developed in local native tongues. Such languages – including the Malay language, the Thai language, the Lao language, Indonesian, Khmer and more – are frequently underrepresented in American and Asian LLMs.

I wish the experts who are creating these sovereign AI systems were aware of the extent to which and how quickly the cutting edge is moving.

A senior director involved in the project explains that these models are created to complement bigger systems, instead of substituting them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he comments, often have difficulty with native tongues and cultural aspects – communicating in unnatural Khmer, for instance, or suggesting meat-containing meals to Malay individuals.

Building regional-language LLMs enables national authorities to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “informed users” of a sophisticated technology developed in other countries.

He adds, I am prudent with the word sovereign. I think what we’re attempting to express is we wish to be better represented and we aim to understand the abilities” of AI technologies.

International Cooperation

Regarding countries attempting to find their place in an intensifying international arena, there’s another possibility: join forces. Experts connected to a respected institution have suggested a public AI company distributed among a consortium of developing nations.

They refer to the proposal “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from the European effective strategy to build a rival to Boeing in the mid-20th century. The plan would involve the creation of a government-supported AI organization that would pool the assets of several countries’ AI programs – such as the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to establish a strong competitor to the US and Chinese giants.

The lead author of a report outlining the proposal states that the idea has attracted the consideration of AI officials of at least three countries so far, along with multiple state AI firms. Although it is now focused on “middle powers”, developing countries – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have additionally indicated willingness.

He comments, Currently, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s reduced confidence in the commitments of this current White House. Experts are questioning for example, can I still depend on any of this tech? In case they decide to